We need to close the growing US Carbon Price Gap for national security, economic competitiveness, and generational responsibility reasons.
Worldwide, carbon pricing is spreading, prices are rising, and Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanisms (CBAMs) are here. The U.S. is now the only developed country without a national carbon price. The EU CBAM started this year, so now exporters from free-polluting countries (including the US) must pay the EU carbon price in trade. Rising carbon prices of our trading partners and their adoption of CBAMS are red flags that we must make it no longer free to pollute in the US to avoid paying others for our pollution.
The growing gap between the U.S. carbon price ($0) and the carbon prices of our trading partners also ignores the biggest economic opportunity of this century: leadership in the next technological revolution in human civilization. As a result, China, not the U.S., is reaping the economic and job benefits of leading the production and sales of wind and solar power solutions, EVs, batteries, and heat pumps.
A steadily rising carbon fee on fossil fuel production will put the U.S. back in the race by unleashing private investment and innovation in 21st-century energy solutions, accelerating production and deployment, and driving efficiencies through economies of scale. It will also harmonize U.S. climate policy with those of our major trading partners - the only way to avoid paying their upcoming CBAMs in trade.
The cash-back approach doesn't just make a carbon fee on fossil fuel production affordable for families; it puts more money in most people's pockets than they have today, transferring polluter profits to all citizens on an equal basis each month. This makes the Carbon Fee and Dividend policy both popular and powerful.
The associated US CBAM will give U.S. manufacturers a competitive advantage, hold free-polluting countries accountable for their pollution, and strongly motivate all free-polluting countries to put a price on carbon, thereby finally putting science-based global climate goals within reach.
Original Article: bit.ly/carbon-price-gap-article
Published in the Green Energy Times (July 2025, page 17)
and the Concord Monitor (July 31, 2025)
One-Pager (+supporting pages): bit.ly/carbon-price-gap-pdf
Slideshow: bit.ly/carbon-price-gap-presentation
Presented in the recordings below,
and on Nov 6, at a Windham community event.
1-Hour Recording (bit.ly/carbon-price-gap-2025):
35-Minute Recording (CCL 3rd Coast Plus Region - C&C):
5-Minute Recording (bit.ly/carbon-price-gap-2024):
“Explicit carbon prices remain a necessary condition of ambitious climate policies” - IPCC SR15
"Carbon pricing is most effective if revenues are redistributed or used impartially... A carbon levy earmarked for green infrastructures or saliently returned to taxpayers corresponding to widely accepted notions of fairness increases the political acceptability of carbon pricing." - IPCC AR6 WG3 TS PDF page 81.
“Estimates for a Below-1.5°C pathway range from 135–6050 USD2010 tCO2-eq −1 in 2030, 245–14300 USD2010 tCO2-eq−1 in 2050, 420–19300 USD2010 tCO2-eq −1 in 2070 and 690–30100 USD2010 tCO2-eq −1 in 2100.” - IPCC SR15
Carbon pricing is spreading, prices are rising, and CBAMs are coming. The World Bank's State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2025 report provides a global view: 28% of the world's greenhouse gas emissions are now under a carbon price.
The EU CBAM starts in January 2026, the UK CBAM starts in 2027, and Japan's CBAM starts in 2027. Canada, Australia, and others are working on CBAMs as well.
“Carbon pricing is a critical part of the policy mix needed to both meet the Paris Agreement goals and support low emissions growth.” - World Bank